Posts Tagged ‘Review’

8
Mar

Science Fiction Classics – Bladerunner

   Posted by: Dave    in Science Fiction

Science Fiction Classics – Bladerunner

Perhaps starting a science fiction classics series about a work as troubled as Bladerunner may seem a strange choice to some, but it contains some clever ideas and what is science fiction if not a world of ideas?

Bladerunner the Movie

Blade Runner - The Final Cut (Two-Disc Special Edition)

Bladerunner performed poorly at the box office at time of release, despite being radically altered “to improve sales” from the director’s (Ridley Scott) initial intentions.  In fact Ridley Scott initially declined to direct the movie preferring to work on Dune instead.  It was only after his brother’s death and work on Dune coming to a halt that he agreed to work on a revised script for Bladerunner.  I am glad he did eventually agree to direct though, his work is excellent.

The studio alteration of the movie is what has given rise to the many “Directors Cut” type releases.

The movie was nominated for two Oscars and fifteen other awards, winning nine; including a Hugo and a BAFTA.  So why did it do so badly at the box office?  Well, it certainly wasn’t because of the cast which included Rutger Hauer (Roy Batty), Daryl Hannah (Pris) and Harrison Ford in the lead role as Deckard – The Bladerunner.

Perhaps the pictures problems were caused by a gap between audience expectation and the actual content of the film.  Movie sci-fi in the early 80’s was all about lasers and showy special effects, probably due to the after effects of the massive success of movies such as Star Wars (1977) and The Empire Strikes Back (1980).

Bladerunner is by contrast a careful, emotional movie about the value of life, both human and machine.  Most of the action takes place in moody, dark scenes in which rain seems to be a constant factor.  For all that, the movie is not depressing as might be assumed.

Bladerunner asks a simple question:  If robots were so advanced that you could not tell them from humans; whose life would be considered more important?  Perhaps this was too much for an audience expecting a space opera?

If you haven’t seen the movie yet, do so.  It can be bought these days for the price of a beer (basic edition).

Blade Runner (The Director's Cut)Blade Runner (The Director's Cut)

Bladerunner the Book (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?)

Blade Runner (Movie-Tie-In Edition)

Bladerunner is based upon the novel by Phillip K. Dick, “Do androids dream of electric sheep?”

The book has a different feel to the various different editions of the movie and I can see why it was altered for the mass market.  It is not that it is a bad book, far from it, but I feel that the direction and feel of Dick’s book is different from the film.  Apparently, shortly before his death, Dick said that “It was my own interior world. They caught it perfectly.”, so what do I know?

Bladerunner Quotes

Holden: Describe in single words only the good things that come into your mind about… your mother.
Leon: My mother?
Holden: Yeah.
Leon: Let me tell you about my mother.
[Leon shoots Holden with a gun he was holding under the table]

My personal favourite quote (movie)

Roy: I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time… like tears in rain… Time to die.

That quote is, for me, the essence of the movie.  If you haven’t seen it I won’t spoil things and tell you why…

Dave Felton

Tags: , , , , , ,

25
Feb

Review: Plot and Structure, James Scott Bell

   Posted by: Dave    in Review, Writing

Review: Plot and Structure, James Scott Bell

Do you find that when you start a piece of writing you are sure of your plot and structure of your story? Do you find that after a only a few chapters (or paragraphs!) you are writing another story altogether? If any of this sounds familiar, this article is for you.

When I first started to become a writer a problem I ran into was that the first three sections in a piece were just great, but over time the story started to wander. This issue would tend to magnify in relation to the length of the piece of work.  I needed advice from a professional writer, or instructor, but I didn’t know any.

The problem, at least in part, was that although I thought I knew what I was setting out to write my actual conception of the overall plot was weak. I knew the end I wanted and many of the plot points along the way, but as soon as the story started my writing seem to go on to wander a path all of its own.

In short, I needed a system.

Plot and Structure

Plot and Structure: Techniques and Exercises for Crafting a Plot that Grips Readers from Start to Finish (Write Great Fiction)

Well, one of the first books I bought in this area was “Plot and Structure” by James Scott Bell.

It is no exaggeration to say that when I read this book I thought I had discovered the “Holy Grail” of writing books (yes, I was a newbie). Plot and Structure suddenly illuminated areas of the writing process I had never even considered.

For instance, are you a NOP or an OP kind or person? It is ok to be confused by those words, they are terms from the book. An OP is an “outline person” and a NOP is a “no outline person”. Mr Bell shows how plotting can still be relevant even if you are a NOP kind of person.

Plot and Structure deals with the usual beginnings, middles and ends of a story but it goes a lot further. The book also deals with techniques for tightening tension and increasing interest, developing characters through plot events, motifs, themes, dialogue and also suggestions on how to generate new plot ideas.

An interesting technique that Mr Bell illustrates for developing plot is the “LOCK” system. This stands for Lead, Objective, Confrontation and Knockout. This acronym is well developed in the book and makes for a very useful addition to the aspiring writers’ toolkit.

Plot and structure gives a brief tour of everything you might need to gain a basic knowledge of writing a longer piece of work. Obviously within 230 pages or so these topics cannot be dealt with in great depth, but this takes nothing away from the book.

It is a great book and one that I learned a great deal from. I can recommend it without reservation for anyone that is having trouble with plot and structure.

Dave Felton.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

16
Feb

Review: Stephen King “On Writing”

   Posted by: Dave    in Review, Writing

Stephen King is a massively popular professional author, so when I found out that he had written a book called “On Writing” I knew I had to read it.  I first got a copy of the book from the local library, read it and then went out and bought a copy anyway, as I thought it was worth the money to be able to read it again at leisure.

“On Writing” is however, definitely not a normal “How to become a writer” type book.  Instruction and hints, books to read etc., are present, but the book is as much autobiography as instruction.  If you are looking for instruction on writing only, you may well be disappointed.

On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft

Instead the book deals with Stephen’s experiences as a writer and how various events have changed his life, not least being run over by a van and nearly killed.  Being the master storyteller that he is the books anecdotal sections are excellent.  There is some great information about the early days as an unknown writer and the effect of his first sale “Carrie” had upon his life. If only that could happen to us all!

Stephen expresses the viewpoint that “Fiction writers, present company included, don’t understand what it is that they do – not why it works when it is good, not why it doesn’t when it is bad.”  He holds the opinion that any instruction book on writing should be short as it will be mostly *ahem* nonsense (not his actual words, but if you want to know what words he did use, buy the book!).

It is this viewpoint that writing cannot truly be taught that keeps him from giving a true tutorial.  This is, in my personal opinion, a shame as the small amount of material he includes on the “How to” of the writing process is excellent.

The Elements of Style

What I found interesting was that he was yet another author that recommended Strunk and White’s guide.  At the time I read “On Writing” I admit that I didn’t possess a copy and had never read it.  It was Stephen King’s recommendation of the book, along with his scathing attacks on the poor English employed by many writers, which finally pushed me into ordering a copy.  This small book has no doubt improved my English, but I still have a long way to go.  Stephen’s attacks on various aspects of poor writing can at times be hilarious and the book is worth buying for this reason alone, for example; “The road to Hell is paved with adverbs”.  Great stuff, especially from a horror writer.

In closing let me say that Stephen King’s “On Writing” is a great book.  It made me laugh and cry, provided some excellent advice and gave an insight into the mind and the life of one of the most popular authors of our time.  While it is not an instruction book on writing, it certainly is worth your time and money.  Go out and buy it.

Dave Felton

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Page 1 of 212