<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>djfelton.com &#187; Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://djfelton.com/category/writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://djfelton.com</link>
	<description>Random witterings of a wannabe writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 22:16:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alien Contact</title>
		<link>http://djfelton.com/2010/06/04/alien-contact/</link>
		<comments>http://djfelton.com/2010/06/04/alien-contact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alien Contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alien Footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission to Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djfelton.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Understanding Alien Contact as a Sci-Fi Writer Alien contact has long been a staple of science fiction writing and I thought it might be a good idea to chat a bit about it with the readers of this blog.  Despite &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://djfelton.com/2010/06/04/alien-contact/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Understanding Alien Contact as a Sci-Fi Writer</h1>
<p>Alien contact has long been a staple of science fiction writing and I thought it might be a good idea to chat a bit about it with the readers of this blog.  Despite the fact that there are many, many movies, books, cartoons, comics and recordings about alien contact almost as soon as you start to discuss the subject seriously people start to get nervous and the easiest way to dismiss their fears is to switch off and call you a “nut” or something equally charming.</p>
<p><span class="wp-decoratr-image"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4021/4576470806_589bae385e_m.jpg" alt="Stephen Hawking Warns of Space Aliens" /><br />
<a rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/9106303@N05/4576470806">Photo by Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com</a></span>For a professional scientist to discuss the subject at all is usually a way to signal that you want your career to end.  For this reason I want to make clear that despite my disagreeing with Stephen Hawking about his recent pronouncements on alien life and our best ways of surviving <a href="http://djfelton.com/2010/04/26/stephen-hawking-on-alien-contact/">alien contact</a>, I admire his courage as a professional scientist in commenting on the subject at all.</p>
<p>The whole topic of aliens and alien species is seldom discussed seriously.  There is no reason to suspect that they will be &#8220;Greys&#8221; or otherwise.  People prefer to discuss the X-files, or their latest government conspiracy theory – “Yes, of course I believe in aliens, but we can’t discuss it as it is above top secret and the government will find out if we do&#8230;”</p>
<p>What?  Are you serious?</p>
<p>Until very recently we had a government in the UK that couldn’t hold onto secret documents already <em>inside</em> intelligence agencies, let alone act with enough efficiency to stop us noticing or talking about something as big as alien contact.</p>
<p>Maybe the new government will be more efficient, but the jury is still out on that one!  <img src='http://djfelton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h2>Space Travel Requires Advanced Technology</h2>
<p>To be serious for a second here, Arthur C Clarke once said that “<em>Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.</em>”</p>
<div style="float: right; padding-left: 10px;"><span class="wp-decoratr-image"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3023/3066756381_eed7e9bc99_m.jpg" alt="Ares I-X Movie Poster" /><br />
<a rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/28634332@N05/3066756381">Photo by nasa1fan/MSFC</a></span></div>
<p>Let us take this a bit further.  As we are currently still developing the ability to launch a successful mission to Mars, how much more advanced would that technology be if it allowed interstellar flight and not just limited space flight in the solar system?</p>
<p>To assist in thinking about this, the distance from Earth to Mars is between 55 million kilometres and 400 million kilometres or so.  For aliens to arrive on Earth they would most likely need to have travelled from another solar system.  If we assume that it would be relatively as difficult for aliens to get to Earth from another solar system as it is for us to get to Mars, then we have a comparative measure of our technological levels.</p>
<p>Not perfect a perfect measure I grant you, but bear with me.</p>
<h2>Travelling to Another Solar System</h2>
<p>So how near is our nearest neighbour, galactically speaking?</p>
<p><span class="wp-decoratr-image"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4007/4195228858_f62c411656_m.jpg" alt="Aliens" /><br />
<a rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/9852146@N07/4195228858">Photo by Markusram</a></span>Proxima Centauri is quite near at a mere 4.2 light years, or maybe Rigil Kentaurus at 4.3 light years.  No doubt those numbers don’t mean a lot if you have no interest in astronomy so here is an explanation.  (I will keep it brief, don&#8217;t go to sleep just yet!)</p>
<p>A light year is the distance light travels in one year.  Light travels at 186,000 miles per second or roughly 300,000 kilometres a second &#8211; whichever you prefer.  From this you can see a light year is a very long way indeed – about 10 trillion kilometres or 6 trillion miles.</p>
<p>Assuming that the trip to Mars from Earth will be taken at the shorter end of the spectrum (less than 60 million kilometres) we can compare this figure with the ability to get to Earth from our nearer stellar neighbours – for round figures lets go for 4.5 light years and include more than one star system.  This means that our alien visitors will have travelled 42,573,287,126,613.6km (4.5 light years).  </p>
<div style="float: right; padding-left: 10px;"><span class="wp-decoratr-image"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1249/847891574_5fa9a9d370_m.jpg" alt="Aliens,extraterrestrial,UFO" /><br />
<a rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/9852146@N07/847891574">Photo by Markusram</a></span></div>
<p>This distance is 709,554 times further than the trip to Mars and is merely the distance to our <em>nearest</em> neighbours. Let us remember that star systems that scientists say could have Earth like planets are even further away.</p>
<p>If the distance travelled really is an indicator of the relative advancement in technology then you had better believe that any alien technology will look like magic to us!  At the very least we can safely assume that they will be well in advance of present day science and military technology.</p>
<h2>Collecting Proof of Alien Contact</h2>
<p>Personally, the question about alien contact is not really about whether or not the government are keeping secrets, or even whether or not we have had alien visitors already.  My question is really is, if aliens landed on Earth, would we even notice?</p>
<p><span class="wp-decoratr-image"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3084/3200346647_0c5aa65ef6_m.jpg" alt="Old Alien Photo" /><br />
<a rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/64856251@N00/3200346647" class="broken_link">Photo by officer2975</a></span>Humans have sufficiently advanced technology to watch animals without the animals being aware of our presence.  In fact we have technology that can spy on the average <em>human</em> without them being able to notice.  If an alien species arrived at Earth and wanted to survey the place; what reason is there to expect that we could even detect them?  Their travel technology would be many, many times more advanced than ours and most likely so would other aspects of their society and technology.</p>
<p>Anyone expecting the arrival of flying saucers and news channels showing alien footage will most likely be seriously disappointed.  The first alien sighting we know of might just be when one says “Hello Mr Obama” and shakes his hand on national television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djfelton.com/2010/06/04/alien-contact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dragon NaturallySpeaking As a Writer&#8217;s Tool</title>
		<link>http://djfelton.com/2010/05/03/dragon-naturallyspeaking-as-a-writers-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://djfelton.com/2010/05/03/dragon-naturallyspeaking-as-a-writers-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 04:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dragon Naturally Speaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech Recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech Recognition Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voice Recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voice Recognition Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djfelton.com/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I made an earlier post about Blade Runner one of the side-effects was that it got my mind thinking about the subject of voice recognition software such as that used by Deckard in the movie.  In a moment of &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://djfelton.com/2010/05/03/dragon-naturallyspeaking-as-a-writers-tool/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I made an earlier post about <a href="http://djfelton.com/2010/03/08/science-fiction-classics-bladerunner/">Blade Runner</a> one of the side-effects was that it got my mind thinking about the subject of voice recognition software such as<em> </em>that<em> </em>used by Deckard in the movie.  In a moment of total madness I decided to buy a copy of Dragon NaturallySpeaking speech recognition software from Amazon.  The software cost £30 (about $45) and I think it is the single best investment of this amount of money I have made in recent times.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dragon-NaturallySpeaking-Standard-OLD-VERSION/dp/B001B5J7T8?SubscriptionId=023HJ2XQ6WZD40WYKCR2&tag=djfeltoncom-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="" ><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51qdZnpajyL._SL160_.jpg" alt="Dragon NaturallySpeaking 10 Standard [OLD VERSION]" /></a></p>
<p>Hurray for impulse buying!</p>
<p>I write at a speed which would probably provide shame to an arthritic snail.  To be more specific, my typing speed does not exceed 20 words per minute.  Despite efforts to improve I remain a confirmed three fingered typist.  I&#8217;ve tried all the usual tools; <em>Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing</em> and video games such as <em>Type or Die</em> to name but two.  There seems to be a blockage between my brain and my fingers&#8230;</p>
<p>In times gone by my typing speed hasn&#8217;t been a problem.  The reason for this was that when I am writing a short story I tend to consider the words and the context in which they are used to a reasonably high degree.  It is probably fair to say that I try to do my first revision at the same time as I do my first draft.  Combining the two activities slows me down considerably.</p>
<p>As I am now far more active in copywriting and producing websites the exact importance of the word has taken a secondary role when compared to the amount of writing produced and the overall message, or impression, it gives.  Due to my slow typing speed producing 5000 words a day or so has been regularly taking me at least eight hours.  Speech recognition software has totally revolutionised this.</p>
<p>On the Nuance website the company claims that using Dragon NaturallySpeaking is three times faster than typing.  In my case this isn&#8217;t saying much!  I am however happy to report that this claim is true.  My daily production has doubled or maybe tripled and the ease of writing an article has increased along with it.</p>
<p>Another claim made on the site is that the software is 99% accurate.  I have a relatively broad Liverpool accent and in my case I would guess that the software achieves about 98%.  The errors the software makes are easily corrected and I can honestly say present me little problem at all.  Everyone makes mistakes in typing and even at my snail&#8217;s pace of 20 words a minute I did too.  Despite these errors in speech recognition accuracy my overall productivity has increased and I am really enjoying writing using the software.  While my version of speech recognition software doesn&#8217;t quite have the science fiction accuracy of Deckard&#8217;s version, I don&#8217;t doubt that that they will one day come.  When that day arrives sign me up for copy!</p>
<p>Getting back to the real world, Dragon NaturallySpeaking has proven itself to be a real boon.  I now have a real choice between doubling or tripling my output, or gaining a couple of extra hour’s spare time every day.  This is a great position to be in.</p>
<p>Another improvement that is worth mentioning is that the software has enabled me to change something about my writing process.  I mentioned earlier that my style of writing fiction is to write slowly and consider each word carefully.  Using voice recognition software has changed that activity for the better in one important regard.  In the past when I&#8217;ve sat down to write a first draft of a story I have frequently struggled to keep the overall ideas in mind as I write.  This problem was caused primarily by my slow typing speed allowing me too much time to think.  Now when I sit down to write a first draft I find it far easier to go with an almost &#8220;stream of consciousness&#8221; style of writing.  Probably for the first time in my writing career I can now sit down and write a full first draft of a short story in one sitting.  Of course the writing still requires proofreading and correction of silly grammar or punctuation mistakes.  I guess no software will get around this any time soon, but this is still a huge improvement.</p>
<p>My previous experiences with speech recognition software have been incredibly frustrating but I am happy to report that Dragon NaturallySpeaking has put a smile on my face.  This blog post was written using the software in probably a third of the time it would have taken me to type it out.</p>
<p>For anyone that is used the voice recognition capabilities of Windows Vista and were unimpressed I have to say I share your opinion.  There is no comparison though between Windows voice recognition and the program provided by Nuance.  They really are light years apart.</p>
<p>The Standard Edition of Dragon NaturallySpeaking version 10.1 comes with a DVD of the software are minimal manual and headset microphone necessary to import voice commands.  This is a complete package as you really do not need a digital voice recorder.  The software is a class leader in voice recognition and in my opinion is a bargain at around £30 ($45).  If you&#8217;re a writer looking to increase your productivity you could do a lot worse than giving Nuance’s Dragon NaturallySpeaking speech recognition software a try.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dragon-NaturallySpeaking-Home-Version-11/dp/B003VNCRNQ?SubscriptionId=023HJ2XQ6WZD40WYKCR2&tag=djfeltoncom-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="" ><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41fpSwYi3tL._SL160_.jpg" alt="Dragon NaturallySpeaking Home, Version 11" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djfelton.com/2010/05/03/dragon-naturallyspeaking-as-a-writers-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Google Duplicate Content Penalty &#8211; Real Life Experiences</title>
		<link>http://djfelton.com/2010/04/13/the-google-duplicate-content-penalty-real-life-experiences/</link>
		<comments>http://djfelton.com/2010/04/13/the-google-duplicate-content-penalty-real-life-experiences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Becoming a writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duplicate Content Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earn cash from writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Make money from writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djfelton.com/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Google Duplicate Content Penalty First of all, was my last post really in March?  Whoops! I have been kind of busy.  I now have 17 websites on the go and I admit to losing track a little.  Overall everything &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://djfelton.com/2010/04/13/the-google-duplicate-content-penalty-real-life-experiences/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>The Google Duplicate Content Penalty</h1>
<p>First of all, was my last post really in March?  Whoops! I have been kind of busy.  I now have 17 websites on the go and I admit to losing track a little.  Overall everything is going well and I am making a small amount of regular cash.  The amount coming in is doubling slowly and so I am hopeful about seeing some genuine residual income in the future.</p>
<p>However this post is about the Google duplicate content penalty and my real life experiences of it rather that what SEO ”experts” will tell you.</p>
<h2>Some Real World Experiences of the Duplicate Content Penalty</h2>
<p>Regular readers will know that I joined an online group back at the start of March in an effort to make a regular income from writing.  This experiment has not really run its course yet and so I have not commented very much on it.  What has happened is that I now know an awful lot more about SEO and making sure that people actually see what you write, instead of blogging to an audience that basically consists of friends and the neighbour’s cat. Admittedly much of what I have learned I still haven’t applied to this site (more is the pity) but will do so in time.</p>
<h2>The Importance of Google</h2>
<p>Like it or not Google is extremely important to webmasters.  The majority of search traffic goes through big G.  If you rank badly in Google then a significant number of potential visitors will most likely never even see your site.  SEO “experts” say content is king, but great content with no traffic is pointless.  If you don’t care about traffic then you should write a diary and keep it under the bed, rather than writing web pages.</p>
<p>What I want to talk about today is events surrounding two of the sites I have set up.</p>
<p>The first is a product review type site, monetised by Amazon Affiliates and the second is an online gaming site that employs auto-feeds to load flash games.</p>
<p>Despite a recent Page Rank review by Google both of these sites are currently PR0 – which effectively means they are at the bottom of the pile.  They are hidden from search engine traffic like a naughty stepchild, locked in the basement.  As I have placed links to these sites, I know from the results on my other websites that these pages should have seen Page Rank improvements and SERP’s increases.</p>
<p>Google maintains that there is no such thing as a duplicate content penalty.  They say that all that happens when two pages show the same content is that they will decide which one is authoritative and show results for that one only.  Webmasters are told that, for a product review site, there is no point in listing the same information as Amazon, <em>unless you add significant original content</em> and reader value <em>alongside the content from Amazon’s page</em>.  This is <em>exactly </em>what I have done, but it appears that this information is wrong.</p>
<p>On my product review site I show an affiliate link to the product on sale along with a review that varies from 350 to 550 words in length.  The Amazon text is marked as blockquote as I believed that a search engine would recognise it for what it is – additional information from a reliable source.  This process of quoting from an authoritative source is standard academic practice and is a principle on which the internet is founded &#8211; always quote your source.</p>
<p>But I was wrong.</p>
<p>The whole site remains at PR0 despite having nine incoming PR6 links along with a variety of others.  The site does not rank in the top 150 in Google even for its own domain name!  This final point is what nails it.</p>
<p>The site you are reading this article on is currently PR2, with only 3 PR6 links and a lot of nofollow PR0 blog links from places where I have left comments.  My other sites have ranked with minimal linking, but all my other sites have 100% original content, bar one.</p>
<p>And guess what?  The other site is also PR0 and doesn’t rank even for its own domain name despite being over 600 pages in size.  So what is the problem?  I suspect that again it is duplicate content.  The second site imports a game, along with a description of what the game is about, how to play etc.  This description comes from the game publisher and is definitely duplicated content as it is widely syndicated.  I did not alter this text as I thought it was wrong to alter the original authors work.  To me, the service I am offering to users is the ability to play games online, not words on a screen.  Again, at least so far as Google is concerned, I was wrong.</p>
<p>To be clear on this, I have no problem with Google penalising duplicate content.  A few years ago the top ten or twenty web pages for a given search would be pr0n or the same content duplicated by a number of webmasters.  This was frustrating and had to stop.</p>
<h2>Is Googles Duplicate Content Advice Wrong?</h2>
<p>What annoys me in this instance is that Google advises two things:</p>
<p>Duplicate content penalties are only relevant to the page the content is on – this doesn’t appear to be true as on the product review site about half of the pages have no Amazon content on them at all and yet none of the pages have a page rank higher than zero and none of the pages rank appropriately in Googles SERPs.  The same pages rank well in Bing and Yahoo incidentally, so it is definitely a Google issue.</p>
<p>The other thing Google implies is that partially duplicated content is ok, so long as the page adds significant value <em>apart </em>from that content.  My product review site carries about 100 words from Amazon and on average maybe 450 words of the review itself, yet the page gets spanked by Google.  In fact not only does the page get spanked, <em>but the whole site does</em>, despite the fact that half of the pages have 100% original content.</p>
<p>Google maintains that there is no such thing as a site wide duplicate content penalty.  Forgive me, but this looks like a site wide penalty to me.</p>
<p>What annoys me further is that I regularly see sites with reasonable page rank and SERPs, that are <em>only </em>providing duplicate content.  How are they getting away with it?  Something is clearly wrong here and as yet I do not understand why this should be the case.  No doubt time and experience will reveal all.</p>
<h2>Avoiding the Google Duplicate Content Penalty</h2>
<p>Looking to the future, what can be done?  Well, I have signed up for copyscape.com’s services.  I now know exactly which pages are being flagged for duplicate content and have started the long process of re-writing them.</p>
<p>Once each page is re-written I will throw a few new links at the sites and affected articles and hope that Googles spider will notice that the content has changed.  If this does not work then I guess I will have to look at other options.</p>
<p>One thing is certain, I will be a lot more careful about employing affiliate links and product information in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djfelton.com/2010/04/13/the-google-duplicate-content-penalty-real-life-experiences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refocussing the Writing</title>
		<link>http://djfelton.com/2010/03/22/refocussing-the-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://djfelton.com/2010/03/22/refocussing-the-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Become a writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Felton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional writer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djfelton.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Refocussing the Writing The original aim of this blog was to show the process by which I changed from being an aspiring writer to the point where I became a professional author.   The idea behind this is simple: There are &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://djfelton.com/2010/03/22/refocussing-the-writing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Refocussing the Writing</h1>
<p>The original aim of this blog was to show the process by which I changed from being an aspiring writer to the point where I became a professional author.   The idea behind this is simple: There are many aspiring authors out there.  By sharing, I hope to help and encourage others who are involved in the same activity.</p>
<p>Over time my personal goals have remained the same, but the methods of achieving them have changed.  For instance, most of my writing these days is freelance and this is an unexpected direction for me to have taken.  While I will always consider myself a “wannabe” author until my first book is published I can no longer say that I am inexperienced as a writer.  So, progress has been made, but is it in the right direction?</p>
<h2>Freelance Activities</h2>
<p>Most of my recent activities have involved either writing “copy” for others, or developing websites – which is really also copywriting, but with me as the client.  Writing copy as a freelance is actually more dependable than any other form of writing I have tried so far.  Even though I feel my standard of English and grammar usage is still lacking, it is possible to make some money.  The income is small, but at least it is there.  It will no doubt grow over time.</p>
<p>I still want to be a science fiction author, but I really have no control over when this will occur.  It depends on when an editor thinks my work is worthy of publishing.  So, unless I want to write a blog about rejection letters received from publishers, there needs to be content produced on other subjects.</p>
<h1>This is a Science Fiction Writing Blog, or is it?</h1>
<p>Regular readers of this blog will know that I recently changed a number of things in order to speed up page load times and make the blog more user-friendly generally.   While I was carrying this out I had a look at the blog using Google webmaster tools.  This tool gives you an idea how Google sees your blog and thereby how likely it is that folks interested in the activities of an aspiring science fiction writer will find your site.</p>
<p>What I found out shocked me.</p>
<p>This site ranks best in Google for&#8230;chess clothing!  OMG!</p>
<p>(I don’t normally use net abbreviations while writing this blog, but here it is probably for the best.  What I actually said is unprintable.)</p>
<h2>How Can Science Fiction and Chess be Confused?</h2>
<p>So how can a science fiction writer’s blog rank best for chess clothing?  Well, quite easily apparently.</p>
<p>I allowed myself to go off topic in two areas:  I posted about the subject of chess clothing a few times and secondly I have more chess links on the site than writing links.  [Note: Shortly after this post goes live I will be removing the offending links.]  The reason I included them at all (before I knew better) was that I wanted to show other aspects of who I am.  A pure writing blog seemed a bit one dimensional.  I now realise that writing about wider areas has a strange effect on Google’s search bot.  Alas, although the search algorithms in use by Google are designed by highly intelligent people, there is still no AI &#8211; it remains science fiction! <img src='http://djfelton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h2>New Computer Chess Blog – Coming soon!</h2>
<p>During recent weeks I have opened a number of new websites and so the process has become increasingly easy and straightforward.  When I realised that my interest in chess was taking the site “off message”, as the politicians are fond of saying, I decided to correct it by opening a new blog site about <a href="http://computerchessonline.net/">computer chess</a>.  The cost of doing so is merely the price of a domain registration as I already pay for hosting.</p>
<p>This new site should mean that I can still say the things I want to on the subject of computer chess, but this blog will be better focussed on what it was originally set up to do:  <strong>Detail the process of growing from a science fiction “wannabe” into a full-time, professional writer.</strong></p>
<p>Of course, right now the site is merely a few lines of blue text, but then this page started life like that too.</p>
<p>Wish me luck.</p>
<p><strong>Dave Felton</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djfelton.com/2010/03/22/refocussing-the-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Marketing is NOT a “Get Rich Quick Scheme”</title>
		<link>http://djfelton.com/2010/03/07/internet-marketing-is-not-a-%e2%80%9cget-rich-quick-scheme%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://djfelton.com/2010/03/07/internet-marketing-is-not-a-%e2%80%9cget-rich-quick-scheme%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earn cash from writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Make money from writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residual Income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing articles for the web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djfelton.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get Rich Quick with Internet Marketing? – Don’t make me laugh This week has been so busy.  To be honest about it, I was unprepared for the amount of work this new direction would entail. Internet marketing has a bad &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://djfelton.com/2010/03/07/internet-marketing-is-not-a-%e2%80%9cget-rich-quick-scheme%e2%80%9d/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Get Rich Quick with Internet Marketing? – Don’t make me laugh</h1>
<p>This week has been so busy.  To be honest about it, I was unprepared for the amount of work this new direction would entail.</p>
<p>Internet marketing has a bad reputation because so many people running the courses are scam artists teaching bad information or maybe nothing at all.  I have been lucky in that the people I am involved with seem genuine and the information supplied checks out, at least so far.  It has been refreshing to have it explained why it takes so much work to be successful.</p>
<p>So, as I am so happy with my new associates am I going to name them?  The short answer is “No”.  The reason why is that until a cheque is cashed and in my bank account it could well all be wrong and it would be incorrect of me to promote an unproven idea.  I hope you understand.</p>
<h2>Developing the New Websites</h2>
<p>My last post mentioned that I am now the proud owner of six new websites.  This actually isn’t quite factual.  What I should have said is “I now own six new domains”.  This difference doesn’t sound like much does it?  So what is the difference?</p>
<p>The difference is about 60,000 words!  Yes, you read that correctly.</p>
<p>What is more remarkable is that the majority of those words are used in marketing the sites, not in content on the actual pages.  Content on the six sites will be maybe 25-30% of that total.  Or at least this percentage will remain true during the time it takes for the sites to establish themselves.  While I am grateful for the new knowledge that I have gained about making money on the internet, I do wonder if just writing that novel would have been easier!</p>
<p>To put things in perspective, minimum manuscript length for science fiction novels tends to be about 85,000 words.  A short story, suitable for submission to a professional magazine like Fantasy and Science Fiction starts at around 5,000 words.  Writing articles of this length is starting to look very reasonable recently!</p>
<p>This last week has seen two of the sites come into existence.  It is far too early to say if they will bring any real income but they are at least up on the web and the initial phase is finished.</p>
<h2>The Search for Financial Security</h2>
<p>So why do all this work?  Well, two reasons.  Firstly, I hope that in the long term I can make a small residual income from the advertising on these websites.  Second, if this happens, then it will take the pressure off my personal financial situation following my hospitalisation and all that goes with it.</p>
<p>Financial security will enable me to write that darned elusive novel with a clean conscience.</p>
<p>That is the plan anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djfelton.com/2010/03/07/internet-marketing-is-not-a-%e2%80%9cget-rich-quick-scheme%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

